Archive for the ‘Hacking’ Category

Winner, Name that Ware March 2019

Wednesday, May 1st, 2019

The ware for March 2019 is the photoflash unit from a Canon IXY10S camera. I’ll go with Roger Gammans as the winner, for being the first to correctly note the manufacturer. Congrats, email me for your prize! I do find it interesting that different manufacturers can have recognizable styles; every designer leaves a thumbprint in the subtle choices that must be made to navigate a huge decision tree of trade-offs.

Also, I love that the IGBT in that device is rated for 150 amps. :) Of course, the rating is just for a very short pulse, but still, it’s in a TSSOP-8 package!

Avalanche Noise Generator Notes

Friday, April 19th, 2019

Good sources of entropy (noise) are an essential part of modern cryptographic systems. I designed a mobile-friendly avalanche noise generator as part of the background work I’ve been doing for the betrusted project (more on that project later). I had to do a new design because the existing open-source ones I could find were too large and power hungry to integrate into a mobile device. I also found it hard to find solid theory pieces on avalanche noise generators, so in the process of researching this I wrote up all my notes in case someone needs to do a ground-up redesign of the system again in the future.

Here’s an excerpt from the notes:

Avalanche breakdown is essentially a miniature particle accelerator, where electrons that enter a PN junction’s depletion region (through mechanisms that include thermal noise) are accelerated across an electrical field, to the point where new electron-hole pairs are generated when these high-energy electrons collide with atoms in the depletion region, creating an amplification cascade with low reproducibility.

An approximate analogy is an inflatable pool filled with water. The height of the pool is the potential barrier of the reverse-biased PN junction. A hose feeding water into the pool represents a constant current of electrons. The volume of the pool can be thought of as the depletion capacitance, that is, the capacitor created by the region of the junction that is void of carriers due to natural drift and diffusion effects. As water trickles into the pool, the water level rises and eventually forms a meniscus. Random disturbances, such as ripples on the surface due to wind, eventually cause the meniscus to crest over the edge of the pool. The water flowing over the edge pushes down on the inflatable pool’s side, causing more water to flow, until the level has reduced to a point where the inflatable pool’s side can snap back into its original shape, thus restarting the cycle of filling, cresting, and breakdown. The unpredictability of when and where the breakdown might happen, and how much water flows out during the event, is analogous to the entropy generated by the avalanche effect in a PN junction.

The electrical characteristic of avalanche noise biased by a constant current source is a “sawtooth” waveform: a linear ramp up in voltage as the capacitance of the depletion region charges to the point where the electric field becomes large enough to initiate the cascade, and then a sharp drop off in voltage as the cascade rapidly discharges the junction capacitance. The cascade then abruptly halts once the field is no longer strong enough to sustain the cascade effect, leading to a subsequent cycle of charging and breakdown.

The site also includes detailed schematics and measurement results, such as this one.

The final optimized design takes <1cm^2 area and draws 520uA at 3.3V when active and 12uA in standby (mostly 1.8V LDO leakage for the output stage, included in the measurement but normally provided by the system), and it passes preliminary functional tests from 2.8-4.4V and 0-80C. The output levels target a 0-1V swing, meant to be sampled using an on-chip ADC from a companion MCU, but one could add a comparator and turn it into a digital-compatible bitstream I suppose. I opted to use an actual diode instead of a NPN B-E junction, because the noise quality is empirically better and anecdotes on the Internet claim the NPN B-E junctions fail over time when operated as noise sources. I’ll probably go through another iteration of tweaking before final integration, but afaik this is the smallest, lowest power open-source avalanche noise generator to date (slightly smaller than this one).

Name that Ware, March 2019

Saturday, March 30th, 2019

The Ware for March 2019 is shown below.

Thanks to Akiba for donating this ware from his bin o’ busted gadgets!

Winner, Name that Ware February 2019

Saturday, March 30th, 2019

The Ware for February 2019 is the old circuit breaker on my flat. It’s a classic, perhaps from the 70’s or earlier; the outer case is so weather-beaten, none of the markings are legible except for the rated capacity (40A). The breaker had been getting progressively more fussy, tripping at random times of the day, so it was time for it to go and get replaced with a new one. It’s definitely annoying to have your power go out at random intervals once every couple weeks. Since it was going into the bin, I figured I’d take it apart and see what I could learn from it. Gratz to phantom deadline for guessing it very quickly (again), email me if you’d like to collect another prize!

Supply Chain Security Talk

Wednesday, February 27th, 2019

I recently gave an invited talk about supply chain security at BlueHat IL 2019. I was a bit surprised at the level of interest it received, so I thought I’d share it here for people who might have missed it.

In the talk, I relay some of my personal trials authenticating my supply chains, then I go into the why of the supply chain attacks to establish some scenarios for evaluating different approaches. The talk attempts to broadly categorize the space of possible attacks, ranging from attacks that cost a penny and a few seconds to pull off to hundreds of thousands of dollars and months. Finally, I try to outline the depth of the supply chain attack surface, highlighting the overall TOCTOU (time of check, time of use) problem that is the supply chain.

The main insight is that transparency or openness of design by itself does little to secure a supply chain, because the entire situation is one huge TOCTOU problem. Checking hardware design files, locking down the assembly line, and Fedexing the product to your office is like hashing and signing your source code, running it through a trusted compiler, and then sending the binary unencrypted over the Internet and trusting it because it was “thoroughly checked”.

The inverse analysis is equally daunting: in software, one may copy each binary into RAM, hash and check its cryptographic signature, and run it only if it checks out. For hardware, there is no equivalent of “hash this instance of hardware and check its cryptographic signature” before use: “hashing” hardware involves taking it apart and inspecting every transistor and wire, which is both impractical and likely to render the hardware non-functional.

Thus while open source hardware does engender some benefits for security (such as disclosing μ-state for Spectre side-channel analysis and ensuring no backdoors due to design oversight), it addresses a separate problem domain from supply chain attacks. While an open source hardware phone is arguably more trustable than a closed source one, open source is necessary but not sufficient for it to be trusted.

I do have some ideas on the practical mitigation of supply chain attacks, but they are still a bit too green to blog about. Stay tuned…